A century ago, the world population was one billion. In the space
of 130 years this figure has doubled and is expected to increase
from today's five billion to reach ten billion within the next
forty years, assuming the current average rate of demographic
growth. This demographic explosion is a major contribution to the
degradation of the environment disturbing the fragile ecological
system.
The South Mediterranean Basin (to which the Occupied Palestinian
Territories and Gaza Strip belong), is no exception and has, like
the rest of the world, been subjected to the same problems of
environmental degra¬dation and demographic explosion. In the
West Bank and the Gaza Strip, however, an added contribution to the
degradation of the environment came in the form of occupation by
Israel.
In the West Bank, agricultural lands have suffered severely as a
result of the prolonged occupation. The Occupied Palestinian
Territories (OPT) have been governed by military orders and
Mandatory laws which go back more than five decades. The Israelis
have issued more than 1,387 military orders in the West Bank and
1,086 in the Gaza Strip which apply to Palestinians only, while
settlers have a free hand in the area. Two of these orders,
(Military Orders No. 1015/1982 and 1039/1983), prohibit the
plan¬tation of any fruit trees without a prior permit. Thus, a
large number of trees have been uprooted, ostensibly for security
reasons. Confiscations and closures have reduced the distribution
of land from 6.2 dunums/capi¬ta in 1967 to 2 dunums/capita in
1992, although the number of inhabitants during those two years of
comparison was almost the same. Agricultural lands have dropped
from 2.6 dunums/capita to below 1.4 dunums/capita at the present
moment.
In the Gaza Strip, the picture is hardly any brighter. The
degradation of the environment, which has been increasing over the
years, has reached such a critical level that in certain areas the
process has become irremedia¬ble. A catalyst has been the
various procedures and legislations of the occu¬pying
authorities, such as placing all control of water resources in the
hands of the military administration (Military Order No. 92/1967),
the over-pumping of underground water and allowing untreated sewage
to flow into the sea.
A Population/Land-and-Resources Equation
The increase in population, which has been a natural reaction to
the occu¬pation policies, impacted negatively on the
environment. Indeed, the equa¬tion of population to land and
resources in the OPT is taxed by the average demographic growth
which exceeds 4 percent per annum, with 50 percent of the
population below the age of fifteen. When the Occupation ends and
an era of peace is established, an increasing number of
Palestinians are expected to return home. This calls for planned
use of available resources, including land.
More than seven persons are living in two- to three-room houses,
and this represents 44.3 percent of the population, while 19.3
percent of the popula¬tion live in houses with more than three
persons per room.1 The average cost of building a modest housing
unit amounts to five-fold, sometimes eight¬fold the total
income of a family, and represents 20 percent of the GNP.
Current Israeli regulations require that new buildings be erected
over a large area of land, 500 sq. meters on average, a practice
which diminishes the possibility of optimal exploitation of the
land. Experts have estimated that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need
about 120,000 new housing units to cover the housing shortage. This
might reach 250,000-300,000 units in the coming five years, in the
eventuality that 0.8 million returnees come home.
Hence, the question arises, what areas will be allotted for the
building of such housing units. There is a marked preference for
detached houses over the more economical apartment blocks,
although, at some point, the latter will inevitably have to be
considered.
More to the point, what will be the impact of the establishment of
such an infrastructure, with all related services and the ensuing
production of waste matter, on the environment and the consumption
of raw materials?
At present, land in the West Bank is utilized according to the
distribution given below, while bearing in mind that Israel
controls 70 percent of the land in the West Bank and 40 percent in
the Gaza Strip:
32 percent of the total area is utilized for forests and
rangelands
32 percent for agriculture (5 percent of which is irrigated)
6 percent for construction
30 percent unexploited
The Gaza Strip has 165,000 dunums of agricultural lands, 112,000 of
which are under irrigation.2
According to the Cairo Agreement and the Declaration of Principles
(DOP), the Israeli settlements will continue to exist during the
interim peri¬od, and their negative impact on the environment
will continue.
Environmental Conditions in the OPT
1. The policy of settlement building together with the confiscation
of lands for various reasons have led to the reduction of those
areas designated as agricultural and rangelands, as well as to the
destruction of the local envi¬ronment. The situation has been
exacerbated by the uprooting of trees ¬more than a
quarter-of-a-million trees, mostly fruit and olive trees, have been
uprooted by the Israeli authorities during the Intifada years. The
remaining area of land, which does not exceed 35 percent of the
total area of the West Bank, is consequently subjected to great
constraints. As men¬tioned earlier, the coming five years will
not see the dismantling of the settlements which constitute one of
the most important factors taxing Palestinian resources. Since the
Washington talks, 530,000 dunums have been confiscated in the West
Bank alone, with a view to building new set¬tlements or
expanding already existing ones.3
2. In the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, there is a chronic water
shortage both in terms of quantity and quality. Through the various
legislations and military orders, Israel has empowered itself to
control all water resources. For example, Military Order No.
92/1967 stipulates the expropriation of wells belonging to absentee
Palestinian owners; the prohibition to drill any new wells without
prior permission from the military authorities (permis¬sion is
rarely granted); the freezing of pumping quotas from wells and the
establishment of control mechanisms to monitor Palestinian water
use. Thus, 80 percent of unreplenishable water in the West Bank is
exploited by Israel. In the Gaza Strip, for example, the annual
deficit exceeds 70 million cubic meters (mcm). The average
consumption/capita in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip does not
exceed 30 percent of the total Israeli consump¬tion/capita.
Finally, the Palestinians pay $1.2/cubic meter to the
$0.33¬O.l/cm which the Israelis pay. With the prospects of a
political solution in sight, the estimated water needs in the West
Bank for all sectors will increase from 120 mcm to over 384 mcm by
the year 2010, 70 percent of which will go for agriculture.
3. The absence of an infrastructure to deal with the disposal of
waste mat¬ter both solid and liquid constitutes a health
hazard and a means of spread¬ing diseases and epidemics,
especially among children. At present, 40-50 percent of sewage gets
collected in some sort of network inside residential areas; the
rest of the population uses septic tanks. It is obvious that in
such circumstances, huge investments are required to update the
existing sew¬erage system, and even to consider the treatment
of waste water for reuse in various domains.
Around 190 kgs of solid waste are produced per person annually, yet
the methods of collection are inadequate, labor and the necessary
equipment for collection are insufficient. The solid waste of the
municipality of West Jerusalem and part of the liquid waste find
their way into the West Bank, while the proportion of West Bank
inhabitants receiving garbage collection services within municipal
boundaries ranges between 40-60 percent.
4. Sound and air pollution are not sufficiently monitored, yet the
dust from quarries, some of which have been constructed against the
wishes of the OPT inhabitants, and licensed without an environment
impact assessment, has caused extensive damage to the environment
and a health hazard to the inhabitants.
Pollution from fumes emitted from car exhausts is a universal
problem, but the lack of strict laws in licensing old cars has
turned into an irremedi¬able problem, considering that the
number of vehicles has jumped from 1,626 in 1970 to 40,070 in 1990
in the West Bank, and from 1,293 to 18,816 in the Gaza Strip for
the same period.4
Transboundary pollution, which has become a global phenomenon, is
very much applicable to the OPT where pollution from industry, and
pos¬sibly from radiation, originates outside the OPT,
especially in Israel. For example, it was estimated that air
pollutants released by Israel in 1990 were: 525,000 tons of carbon
monoxide, 156,000 tons of nitrogen oxide, 275,000 tons of sulfur
oxide and 9.6 million tons of carbon dioxide.5
5. The excessive use of pesticides is facilitated by the fact that
Israel allows the importation of internationally banned products
such as DOT, 2 4-0, etc. It has been estimated there were around
twenty kinds of forbidden pesticides still in use. Moreover, since
the instructions for use are written either in Hebrew or in a
foreign language, the farmers' ignorance can prove calamitous, as
some of these pesticides have been known to cause genetic
malformations in embryos, and mutations in insects and living
organisms.
6. In spite of the deplorable state the environment is in, it has
not figured high on the list of priorities in the OPT, especially
during the years of the Intifada. This is normal, since people's
existential concern is primarily the satisfaction of biological and
survival needs; the environment comes lower on the priority scale,
although a new attitude is now emerging. An impor¬tant point
to consider, if we are to preserve a renewable and sustainable
environment, is the need to provide for harmony between the needs
for growth and development and those of the environment. Care for
the envi¬ronment starts with the simplest of gestures,
acquired at home and at school: not to litter, not to cut wild
flowers, not to destroy plants.
In Conclusion
There was once a time when the whole of natural Palestine was a
land of milk and honey. It was host to forests, rare wild flowers
and living crea¬tures: 2,500 species of plants, 150 of which
are native to Palestine; 70 species of mammals; 480 of birds; 90 of
reptiles and 80 of amphibians.6 Now the OPT are subject to
desertification and a paucity of natural resources, the result of
years of over-exploitation by the Occupation, and overall neglect
of the environment.
The Palestinian National Authority seems to have its work cut out
for it in assuming the vital role of the protection of the
environment. It will have to set in motion strategies respecting
the natural, economic and social assets of the land; to promulgate
laws and regulations for the protection of the environment and to
establish foundations which will ensure a con¬stantly
renewable environment through relevant programs, policies and
norms. These might include:
1. The sponsorship of consciousness-raising programs for the
preservation of the ecological balance in all levels of daily
activities. Attention should be drawn to the dangers arising from
the use of chemical products such as beauty products, pesticides,
fertilizers, plastics or any other synthetic prod¬ucts.
2. The establishment of an infrastructure to safeguard a healthy
environ¬ment and to promote the treatment and recycling of
waste matter both solid and liquid, and to ensure that water
sources are kept germ-free and fit for domestic consumption.
3. A concern for the quality of air and water in order to limit the
pollutants. This involves a review of existing agricultural
methods, the adoption of integrated pest management methods,
encouragement of aquaculture, water conservation and the reuse of
treated waste water.
4. Involving the population in the development process in order to
find an organic relationship between developmental needs and the
requirements for a healthy and sustainable environment.
5. The promotion of studies and research projects to produce an
environ¬ment profile, emphasizing the use of the land to
preserve the topsoil, in order to minimize the factors leading to
desertification and erosion.
6. Proper planning to separate residential areas on the one hand,
and com¬mercial and industrial ones on the other, and to allot
land for parks and nature reserves.
7. An awareness of insidious pollutants such as radiation emitted
from televisions and microwaves, in addition to sound pollution and
inesthetic town planning.
The enormous amounts of money spent yearly on the manufacture of
weapons and means of mass destruction can be put to so much better
use for the preservation of the environment and the ecological
system, for as it has been said: it is better to light a single
candle than to curse the darkness.
Endnotes
1 Adnan Shqueir, "A Summary of the Environmental Conditions in the
Occupied Palestinian Territories." (Arabic), a paper presented at
the first Regional Conference for the Conditions and Requirements
of Environmental Policies in the Arab World, Jordan, Yarmouk
University, 1993.
2 Development Perspectives for Agriculture in the Occupied
Palestinian Territories Jerusalem: Society for Austro-Arab
Relations, 1992.
3 Al-Quds, Jerusalem, 30 March, 1994.
4 Shqueir, opcit.
5 Reports of the Technical Committee on the Palestinian
Environment, Jerusalem, 1992 (unpublished).
6 Ibid.